Priest Calls President "Stupid"

Nairobi, Kenya – In recent months, the Kenyan political scene has witnessed an unexpected player taking a bold stance: the church. Religious leaders, particularly from the Catholic Church, have increasingly called out politicians for social and political injustices, positioning themselves as moral arbiters in the nation’s political discourse.

The controversy began when President William Ruto made a substantial donation to a Catholic church, only for the church to return the money, citing a commitment to remain uncompromised. This move garnered widespread support from many clergymen who echoed the sentiment that the church must remain a neutral ground, free from political influence.

President Ruto defended his actions, stating, “I have been donating to the church for a long time, and it is my duty as a good Christian to give to the church. We don’t go to church for politics; we go because we want to go to heaven.”

However, the situation took a contradictory turn when former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua attended a church service and made a donation, which was accepted. In a now-viral clip, the priest praised Gachagua, emphasizing that the politician donated discreetly without announcing the amount, unlike President Ruto. The priest further criticized Ruto for publicly announcing his donation and called the President “stupid” for doing so, arguing that the congregation might have slept hungry and needed essential items like flour instead.

“The priest claims that he accepted Gachagua’s money because he did not announce the amount but rejected Ruto’s because it was announced, and it did not include unga for those who had slept hungry,” a commentator explained. “He proceeded to call the President of Kenya stupid at the pulpit.”

This incident has sparked a debate about the church’s role in politics, revealing deep divisions within religious institutions. While the church has traditionally been seen as a place of refuge and impartiality, these events suggest that it is becoming increasingly entangled in political battles.

Critics argue that the church should remain neutral and focus on its spiritual mission rather than getting involved in political disputes. “The church has clearly crossed its line,” said a political analyst. “By taking sides, it risks alienating members of its congregation and undermining its moral authority.”

Supporters of the church’s stance, however, believe that religious leaders have a duty to speak out against injustice and hold politicians accountable. “The church cannot stand by and watch as politicians engage in actions that harm the public,” said a local pastor. “It must be a voice for the voiceless and a beacon of truth.”

The contrasting treatment of President Ruto and former Deputy President Gachagua highlights the complex relationship between religion and politics in Kenya. As the 2027 elections approach, the role of the church in political matters is likely to remain a contentious issue.

For now, the battle lines are drawn, with the church finding itself in the midst of a political storm. Whether this will strengthen its moral standing or lead to further division remains to be seen. One thing is clear: the church’s influence in Kenyan politics is significant, and its actions will continue to shape the national conversation.